Which remedy requires the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations?

The remedy that requires the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations is specific performance. This legal remedy is typically ordered by a court when monetary damages are insufficient to address the harm caused by the breach. Specific performance mandates that the party who failed to uphold their end of the contract must complete the actions or deliver the goods as originally agreed upon in the contract.

Specific performance is particularly applicable in cases where the subject matter of the contract is unique, such as in real estate transactions or the sale of rare items, where simply compensating the non-breaching party with money would not adequately resolve the situation. By enforcing specific performance, the court ensures that the non-breaching party receives the exact benefit they were entitled to under the contract.

In contrast, other remedies mentioned, such as monetary damages, nominal damages, and injunctions, do not compel the breaching party to complete their contractual obligations in the same direct manner as specific performance does. Monetary damages provide a financial compensation, nominal damages recognize a breach where no actual loss occurred, and injunctions prevent a party from taking certain actions but do not require them to perform specific duties under a contract.